PHARMACOTHERAPY OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS (2015-2025)

Authors

  • Bernardo Tolentino Costa
  • Ana Laura Almeida Rodovalho
  • Fabio Kendy Nishino
  • Bruno Santos De Oliveira
  • Rafael da Silva
  • Cauã Cabral Magno da Fonseca
  • Paulo Ricardo Rocha de Araujo
  • Lis Melo de Lima
  • Luiz Gustavo Barbosa Fantin
  • Amanda Souza dos Santos
  • André Mateus Marques
  • Erick Silva Cardoso
  • Giovanna Menezes Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2026.020-031

Keywords:

ADHD, Adults, Methylphenidate, Lisdexamfetamine, Atomoxetine, Guanfacine, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 2.5% of the adult population globally. Multiple pharmacological agents are available, yet comparative efficacy and safety data remain limited.Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for adults with ADHD using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and 2025. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs in adults (≥18 years) with ADHD diagnosed according to DSM-IV, DSM-5, or ICD-10/11 criteria. Primary outcome was symptom reduction measured by validated scales (ADHD-RS, Conners, SNAP-IV). Secondary outcomes included adverse events, discontinuation rates, and functional improvement. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0. Meta-analysis employed random-effects models with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics. GRADE methodology was applied to assess evidence quality. Results: Thirty-seven RCTs (n=2,289 adults) were included. Methylphenidate extended-release demonstrated the largest effect size (SMD: −0.92; 95% CI: −1.08 to −0.76), followed by lisdexamfetamine (SMD: −0.96; 95% CI: −1.17 to −0.76), mixed amphetamine salts (SMD: −0.81; 95% CI: −0.95 to −0.67), and atomoxetine (SMD: −0.48; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.33). Guanfacine showed moderate efficacy (SMD: −0.66; 95% CI: −0.94 to −0.38). Stimulants demonstrated superior acceptability compared to non-stimulants. Adverse events were generally mild and dose-dependent. Heterogeneity was moderate (I²: 30–50%). Conclusion: Stimulant medications, particularly methylphenidate and lisdexamfetamine, represent first-line pharmacological treatments for adults with ADHD, with large effect sizes and favorable tolerability profiles. Non-stimulants offer alternatives for patients with contraindications or comorbidities. Evidence quality ranges from moderate to high for stimulants and low to moderate for non-stimulants.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Costa, B. T., Rodovalho, A. L. A., Nishino, F. K., De Oliveira, B. S., da Silva, R., da Fonseca, C. C. M., de Araujo, P. R. R., de Lima, L. M., Fantin, L. G. B., dos Santos, A. S., Marques, A. M., Cardoso, E. S., & Lima, G. M. (2026). PHARMACOTHERAPY OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS (2015-2025). Seven Editora, 511-533. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2026.020-031