MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LATERAL WINDOW TECHNIQUE AND THE TRANSCRESTAL TECHNIQUE

Authors

  • Roberto Machado Cruz
  • Marcelo Vitale
  • Patrícia de Hollanda Cavalcanti Aragão Costa
  • Micaell da Silva Souza
  • Cristiane Elisa Ribas Batista
  • Caio Uriel Vinhote do Nascimento
  • Julia de Araújo Koplowitz Bento
  • Matheus Rodrigues Serafim Silva
  • Priscila Pereira Batista
  • Douglas José de Araújo Ferreira
  • Giovanni Daleffe
  • Theodoro Ribeiro Andrade
  • Jefferson José de Oliveira
  • ulo Roberto Steinberg da Cruz de Almei
  • Mariana Silva Cestari
  • Caroline Weinert Marçal
  • Robson José Mendonça Dias
  • Fernanda Karla Duailibe Fontes
  • Ivan Silva Andrade
  • Vilmar Santos de Almeida
  • Brunno Pereira Silva
  • Arnoldo Brasil Muniz Júnior
  • Renato Mendes Almeida
  • Ronald Rojas Concepción
  • Claudiony Henrique Dantas de Sousa Azevedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2026.020-003

Keywords:

Maxillary Sinus Lift, Dental Implants, Lateral Window Technique, Transcrestal Technique, Bone Graft

Abstract

Maxillary sinus lift is a widely used procedure to enable dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla in cases of reduced bone height. Among the available techniques, the lateral window approach and the transcrestal technique stand out, presenting differences regarding invasiveness, bone gain, and postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to perform an integrative literature review comparing these two techniques in terms of indications, advantages, limitations, and clinical outcomes. The search was conducted in PubMed, SciELO, and ScienceDirect databases using specific descriptors combined with Boolean operators. Clinical studies, randomized trials, systematic reviews, and observational studies published between 2012 and 2025 were included. The results showed that both techniques present high implant survival and success rates. The lateral window technique demonstrated superior bone gain, especially in cases of severe atrophy, whereas the transcrestal technique showed lower morbidity and greater patient comfort. It is concluded that the choice of technique should be individualized, considering anatomical factors, residual bone height, and case complexity.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

Cruz, R. M., Vitale, M., Costa, P. de H. C. A., Souza, M. da S., Batista, C. E. R., do Nascimento, C. U. V., Bento, J. de A. K., Silva, M. R. S., Batista, P. P., Ferreira, D. J. de A., Daleffe, G., Andrade, T. R., de Oliveira, J. J., de Almei, ulo R. S. da C., Cestari, M. S., Marçal, C. W., Dias, R. J. M., Fontes, F. K. D., Andrade, I. S., … Azevedo, C. H. D. de S. (2026). MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LATERAL WINDOW TECHNIQUE AND THE TRANSCRESTAL TECHNIQUE. Seven Editora, 20-30. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2026.020-003