MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT TECHNIQUES: INDICATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR REHABILITATION OF ATROPHIC MAXILLAE

Authors

  • Sebastião Diogo Fiochi Almeida Matozo
  • Dayvid de Sousa Santana Fernandes
  • José Eduardo Tannuri Nemeth
  • Giulia Dias Ribeiro
  • Ivan Queiroz Montanha
  • Hallef Rossetti da Silva
  • Claudionor Ribeiro de Vasconcelos Ferreira Neto
  • João Cavalcante da Silva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv5n1-018

Keywords:

Maxillary Sinus Lift, Dental Implants, Biomaterials, Atrophic Maxilla

Abstract

The present study consists of a narrative literature review aimed at discussing maxillary sinus lift techniques, their clinical indications, and the criteria for rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. Tooth loss in the posterior maxillary region, combined with maxillary sinus pneumatization, results in insufficient bone volume for implant placement, making sinus floor elevation a fundamental and predictable surgical technique. The methodology was based on a search in the PubMed database, selecting articles published in the last five years in Portuguese and English. The results indicate that the choice between the lateral window technique and the transcrestal approach should be based on residual bone height, with the lateral approach indicated for remnants smaller than 4 to 5 mm. Technological advances are highlighted, particularly the osseodensification technique and the use of piezoelectric devices to reduce complications, such as perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. Regarding biomaterials, although autogenous bone remains the gold standard, xenografts and the use of platelet concentrates (L-PRF) show excellent results in accelerating new bone formation and healing. It is concluded that maxillary sinus lift is a safe procedure when preceded by careful three-dimensional planning, enabling satisfactory functional rehabilitation in patients with severe maxillary atrophy.

References

Alshamrani, A. M., et al. (2023). Maxillary sinus lift procedures: An overview of current techniques, presurgical evaluation, and complications. Cureus, 15(11), Article e49553. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49553

Alsharekh, M. S., et al. (2024). Evolving techniques and trends in maxillary sinus lift procedures in implant dentistry: A review of contemporary advances. Cureus, 16(10), Article e71424. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71424

Díaz-Olivares, L. A., et al. (2021). Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7(1), Article 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00346-7

Gaspar, J., Mazor, Z., & Bonfante, E. A. (2024). Osseodensification technique in crestal maxillary sinus elevation—A narrative review. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 26. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13399

Jadach, R., et al. (2024). Classifying maxillary sinuses of Polish patients for sinus lift: A pilot study. Dentistry Journal, 12(2), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12020035

Malcangi, G., et al. (2023). Maxillary sinus augmentation using autologous platelet concentrates (platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and concentrated growth factor) combined with bone graft: A systematic review. Cells, 12(13), Article 1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131797

Otero, A. I. P., et al. (2022). Sinus lift associated with leucocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (second generation) for bone gain: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(7), Article 1888. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071888

Downloads

Published

2026-02-14

How to Cite

MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT TECHNIQUES: INDICATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR REHABILITATION OF ATROPHIC MAXILLAE. (2026). International Seven Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(1), e9375. https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv5n1-018