THE CESSATIONIST CLAUSE OF THE WESTMINSTER CONFESSION OF FAITH (WCF 1.1): THEOLOGICAL INTENTION, HISTORICAL CONTEXT, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE ON REVELATION

Abstract

This article presents a critical-theological analysis of the cessationist clause found in the Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF 1.1), aiming to examine its original intention, historical context, and implications for the contemporary debate on revelation. The study adopts a historical-theological and exegetical approach, exploring the Puritan distinction between immediate and mediate revelation, as well as the role of spiritual gifts in the apostolic era. It argues that the clause should not be interpreted as an absolute denial of divine communication, but rather as a delimitation of normative revelation carrying canonical authority. In light of this framework, the article critically evaluates contemporary positions - classical cessationism and Reformed continuationism - highlighting their contributions and internal tensions. It concludes that the Reformed tradition supports a qualified cessationism that upholds both the sufficiency of Scripture and the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit.