SYSTEMATIC MAPPING OF THE LITERATURE ON ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP (2014–2024): CRITICAL FACTORS, BARRIERS, AND PERSPECTIVES FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

Authors

  • Vitor Bruno
  • Maria Elizete Kunkel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/rcsv15n10-009

Keywords:

Academic Entrepreneurship, Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, Academic Startups

Abstract

The conversion of academic knowledge into economic and social value has become a strategic challenge for universities, governments, and industry, particularly given the growing demand for innovation and diversified research funding sources. In this context, understanding academic entrepreneurship is essential to analyze how scientific knowledge can generate social and economic impact. This study aims to map and classify conceptual domains and empirical evidence on the subject, identify critical success factors and barriers institutional, regulatory, ecosystemic, and identity-based and develop a matrix of factors versus evidence. To this end, a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) was conducted using Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering the period 2014–2024, and applying rigorous inclusion, exclusion, and quality criteria through the Parsifal tool. The findings show that the literature converges on the importance of integrating institutional, regulatory, ecosystemic, and identity dimensions, emphasizing that focusing solely on human capital is insufficient. It is concluded that the advancement of academic entrepreneurship depends on the synergy between clear institutional policies, flexible regulation, collaborative ecosystems, and the strengthening of scientists’ entrepreneurial identity, positioning it as a key driver of technology transfer and sustainable innovation in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALI, M. A.; HUSSIN, N.; HADDAD, H.; ALKHODARY, D.; MAREI, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Their Impact on Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 18, p. 10028, 2021. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10028

AMADEI, J. R. P.; TORKOMIAN, A. L. V., As patentes nas universidades: análise dos depósitos das universidades públicas paulistas (1995-2006). Ciência da Informação, [S.L.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 9-18, ago. 2009. IBICT. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-19652009000200001

BENEDETTI, M. H.; TORKOMIAN, A. L. V., Uma análise da influência da cooperação Universidade-Empresa sobre a inovação tecnológica. Gestão; Produção, [S.L.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 145-158, 2011. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2011000100011

BOH, W. F.; DE-HAAN, U.; STROM, R. J., University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: faculty and students in spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 4, p. 661–669, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-015-9399-6

BORG, E.; SÖDERLUND, J., Liminality competence: an interpretative study of mobile project workers conception of liminality at work. Management Learning, [S.L.], v. 46, n. 3, p. 260-279, 3 jan. 2014. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350507613516247.

BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; MACEDO, M., O MÉTODO DA REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA NOS ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS. Gestão e Sociedade, [S.L.], v. 5, n. 11, p. 121, 2 dez. 2011. Revista Gestão e Sociedade. http://dx.doi.org/10.21171/ ges.v5i11.1220

BRASIL. Lei 8.112. Brasília, 11 dez. 1990. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8112cons.htm. Acesso em: 7 out. 2025.

__________________. Lei 10.973. Brasília, 02 dez. 2004. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm. Acessado em: 30 mar. 2023.

CRESPO, N. Entrepreneurial universities: collaboration, education and policies. Journal of small business and entrepreneurship, v. 31, n. 3, p. 265–267, 2019. Routledge. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08276331.2018.1485543

DAS, R., Entrepreneurship: the other name of innovation. International Journal Of Research Publication And Reviews, [S.L.], v. 4, n. 12, p. 3606-3616, 18 dez. 2023. Genesis Global Publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.1223.123546.

EVERS, N.; CUNNINGHAM, J. A.; HOHOLM, T., Technology Entrepreneurship: Bringing Innovation to the Marketplace. [s.l.: s.n.]. Disponível em: https://www.amazon.com/Technology-Entrepreneurship-Bringing-Innovation-Marketplace/dp/1137020105.

GANZARAIN, J.; MARKUERKIAGA, L.; IGARTUA, J. I. How Does Working on University-Business Collaborative Projects Foster the Industrial Doctorates’ Learning Process? p.25–32, 2019. Engineering Digital Transformation. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-96005-0_4

GRIMALDI, R.; GRANDI, A., Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, [S.L.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 111-121, fev. 2005. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00076-2.

HAYTER, C. S.; FISCHER, B.; RASMUSSEN, E., Becoming an academic entrepreneur: how scientists develop an entrepreneurial identity. Small Business Economics, p. 1-19, 2021

JOHNSON, D.; GIANIODIS, P. T.; HARRISON, R. T.; BOCK, A. J., From laboratory to clinic: science commercialization within university centered entrepreneurial ecosystems. R&D Management, [S.L.], v. 53, n. 1, p. 3-23, 9 maio 2022. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12535

KATTEL, R.; DRECHSLER, W.; KARO, E., How to make an entrepreneurial state: why innovation needs bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2022.

LIMA, J.; TORKOMIAN, A. L.; OPRIME, P. C.; BORGES, T., SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY COLLABORATIONS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND PRETEST. Conference: Cladea The Latin American Council Of Management Schools, jun. 2022.

NAMBOGA, P., Assessing the perception of students on viability of business ventures in Eenhana. 2023. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração – Management Strategy) – University of Namibia, Windhoek, 2023.

NANO-X IMAGING LTD. Nanox Imaging Ltd. Disponível em: https://www.nanox.vision/. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2025.

OLIVEIRA, M. R.; TORKOMIAN, A. L. V. How to Stimulate an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem? Experiences of North American and European Universities. Innovar, [S.L.], v. 29, n. 71, p. 11-24, 1 jan. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v29n71.76392

PETERSEN, K.; FELDT, R.; MUJTABA, S.; MATTSSON, M., Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. Electronic Workshops In Computing, [S.L.], jun. 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8

RASMUSSEN, E.; WRIGHT, M.; WRIGHT, M. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 5, p. 782–799, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-014-9386-3

SMALLBONE, D.; WELTER, F., Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies: necessity or opportunity driven?. Entrepreneurship And Context, [S.L.], p. 15-30, 26 jul. 2019. Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/ 9781788119474.00007 .

SOARES, T. J.; TORKOMIAN, A. L. V.; NAGANO, M. S., University regulations, regional development and technology transfer: the case of brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [S.L.], v. 158, p. 120129, set. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120129

SARASVATHY, S.; WHEATLEY, Glen B. Effectual entrepreneurship. 3. ed. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2025.

STYLIANIDIS, E.; CHRYSOVERGIS, V.; TOKA, E., From classroom to marketplace: the impact of digital transformation on academic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship And Digital Humanities, [S.L.], p. 209-226, 8 nov. 2024. Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781035331864.00025.

TORKOMIAN, A. L.; SANTOS, M. E. R. dos; SOARES, T. J. C. C., The Innovation Law, the creation of technology transfer offices and their impact on the Brazilian innovation landscape. In: BREZNITZ, Shiri M.; ETZKOWITZ, Henry. University Technology Transfer: the globalization of academic innovation. [S.I.]: Taylor And Francis Inc, 2015. Cap. 15. p. 336-360.

TULA, S. T.; OFODILE, O. C.; OKOYE, C. C.; NIFISE, A. O. A.; ODEYEMI, O., Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the usa: a comparative review with european models. [S. l.], 2024. DOI: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.799.

TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P., Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal Of Management, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 207-222, set. 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

UGNICH, E. A.; CHERNOKOZOV, A. I.; VELICHKO, E. V., Innovation Ecosystem of Higher Educational Institution as a Driver of Commercialization of Intellectual Activity Results. Mediterranean Journal Of Social Sciences, [S.L.], v. 0, n. 0, 1 nov. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s1p239

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO PAULO (UNIFESP). Atividade remunerada. UNIFESP, [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://site.unifesp.br/cppd/atividade-remunerada. Acesso em: 7 out. 2025.

WANG, M.; SOETANTO, D.; CAI, J.; MUNIR, H.. Scientist or Entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. The Journal Of Technology Transfer, [S.L.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 119-146, 27 jan. 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6.

WAWAK, S.; DOMINGUES, J. P. T.; SAMPAIO, P.. Quality 4.0 in higher education: reinventing academic-industry-government collaboration during disruptive times. The Tqm Journal, [S.L.], v. 36, n. 6, p. 1569-1590, 3 nov. 2023. Emerald. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tqm-07-2023-0219.

WILLIAMS, C. C.; ROUND, J., Evaluating informal entrepreneurs' motives: evidence from Moscow. International Journal Of Entrepreneurial Behavior; Research, [S.L.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 94-107, 30 jan. 2009. Emerald. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552550910934477.

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Bruno , V., & Kunkel, M. E. (2025). SYSTEMATIC MAPPING OF THE LITERATURE ON ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP (2014–2024): CRITICAL FACTORS, BARRIERS, AND PERSPECTIVES FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. Revista Sistemática, 15(10), e8316 . https://doi.org/10.56238/rcsv15n10-009