RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS RELATED TO DEJUDICIALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2026.008-133Keywords:
Dejudicialization, Civil Name, Multi-Door JusticeAbstract
The article analyzes the transition from the traditional justice model to the Multi-Door Justice paradigm, focusing on the modification of civil names in extrajudicial notary and registry offices in Brazil and Argentina; it highlights the relevance of the civil name as a fundamental personality right and the need to rationalize the justice system in light of the Judiciary’s overload; dejudicialization is presented as a means of ensuring access to justice, efficiency, and legal certainty through extrajudicial agents, notaries, and registrars endowed with public faith; the study is grounded in the theory of the name as an attribute of personality and in human dignity, citing the perspectives of Immanuel Kant, the absolute value of dignity, and Ronald Dworkin, equality and freedom; the text incorporates concepts of Restorative Justice, defined as a process that directly involves those affected in order to restore social harmony and humanize justice; furthermore, it mentions the expansion of methods such as mediation and conciliation within extrajudicial offices, in accordance with Law 13.140/2015, and the influence of European guidelines in promoting restorative programs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.