BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES WITH AUTOGENOUS GRAFTS: INDICATIONS AND DONOR SITE SELECTION CRITERIA

Authors

  • Sebastião Diogo Fiochi Almeida Matozo
  • Dayvid de Sousa Santana Fernandes
  • Mordecai Amado de Souza Ribeiro
  • Paula Melissa Vasconcelos dos Santos
  • Maria Eduarda Coutinho Figueirêdo de Araújo
  • Ítalo Júnior Almeida Josias
  • Camila Rocha Pinheiro
  • Mel Vaz Curvo Brunswick
  • Otávio Silveira Rizzi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv5n1-015

Keywords:

Autogenous Bone Graft, Dental Implants, Bone Reconstruction, Donor Site, Processed Human Dentin

Abstract

The long-term viability of dental implants is intrinsically linked to the presence of robust bone support. In cases of tooth loss resulting in severe resorption, ridge reconstruction becomes an indispensable step, and autogenous grafting is widely recognized as the gold standard due to its biological triad: osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction. This narrative review examines contemporary bone reconstruction techniques and the criteria for donor site selection, based on evidence collected from the PubMed database over the past ten years. The data indicate that, in addition to traditional autologous bone, the use of processed dental tissues (such as dentin) has emerged as an alternative with high biocompatibility and low morbidity, delivering solid clinical outcomes. In the management of horizontal defects in esthetic areas, the combination of bone chips with cortical barriers has proven effective in minimizing postoperative discomfort without compromising volumetric gain. On the other hand, cases of greater structural complexity may still require harvesting from extraoral sites. In summary, the success of regeneration lies in the clinician’s ability to select the technique that best balances the patient’s volumetric demand with biological preservation, reaffirming the superiority of the individual’s own tissue in achieving high-quality and stable newly formed bone.

References

Ferraz, M. P. (2023). Bone grafts in dental medicine: An overview of autografts, allografts and synthetic materials. Materials, 16(11), Article 4117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114117

Karkar, K. T., Metwally, S. A., & Mohsen, K. M. (2023). Anterior aesthetic zone reconstruction with allogenic bone shell and autogenous bone chips - An evaluative study. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 13(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_34_23

Khan, M. W., et al. (2023). Biological reconstruction of posteromedial tibial defect with autogenous bone graft in complex knee arthroplasty. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 57(6), 856–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00857-y

Miron, R. J., et al. (2017). Use of platelet-rich fibrin in regenerative dentistry: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21(6), 1913–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2133-z

Peceliunaite, G., Pliavga, V., & Juodzbalys, G. (2023). The use of autogenous teeth tissues grafts for alveolar bone reconstruction: A systematic review. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research, 14(4), Article e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2023.14402

Thoma, D. S., et al. (2023). Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading. Journal of Periodontology, 94(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0226

Zhang, S., et al. (2021). Comparison of autogenous tooth materials and other bone grafts. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 18(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4

Downloads

Published

2026-02-14

How to Cite

BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES WITH AUTOGENOUS GRAFTS: INDICATIONS AND DONOR SITE SELECTION CRITERIA. (2026). International Seven Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(1), e9372. https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv5n1-015