REHABILITATION PROTOCOLS WITH ZYGOMATIC IMPLANTS: INDICATIONS FOR SEVERE MAXILLARY ATROPHY AND BONE RESORPTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/isevmjv5n2-022Keywords:
Zygomatic Implants, Atrophic Maxilla, Survival Rate, Oral Rehabilitation, Bone GraftingAbstract
The rehabilitation of patients with severely atrophic maxilla represents one of the central challenges in contemporary implant dentistry. The loss of alveolar bone volume, accentuated by maxillary sinus pneumatization and prolonged use of complete dentures, limits or makes the placement of conventional implants unfeasible, thus requiring complementary surgical strategies. In this context, zygomatic implants—originally introduced by Brånemark et al. in the late 1980s as an alternative to extensive bone grafting procedures—have been established as a documented therapeutic option for patients with advanced maxillary atrophy. The present study consists of a comparative analysis of three recent scientific publications: a systematic review on success rates (Solà Pérez et al., 2022), an international consensus report developed by the International Team for Implantology—ITI (Al-Nawas et al., 2023), and a systematic review on clinical indications (Polido et al., 2023). The analyzed data include follow-ups of up to 11.8 years and encompass hundreds of patients across multiple international centers. Cumulative survival rates ranged from 96.1% to 98.5% depending on the follow-up period, with slightly higher rates observed for immediate loading protocols compared to delayed loading (98.1% versus 95.0%). Documented indications include extreme bone atrophy, previous implant or graft failure, oncologic resection, trauma, and congenital defects. The most prevalent complications were maxillary sinusitis (14.2%) and soft tissue dehiscence (34.7%), while prosthetic mechanical failures accounted for 17.8% of the reported adverse events. The body of reviewed evidence supports that zygomatic implants represent a safe, predictable, and long-term effective alternative for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. However, given the anatomical risks involved and the heterogeneity in success criteria adopted in the literature, the procedure should be reserved for centers with specialized surgical and rehabilitative expertise.
References
Al-Nawas, B., et al. (2023). ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: Indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(28), 1–10.
Gaur, V. (2023). Zygomatic approach with single-piece implants: A technical note. Journal of Dental Specialities, 11(1), 1–7.
Kämmerer, P. W., et al. (2023). Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: A systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(11), 1–13.
Polido, W. D., et al. (2023). Indications for zygomatic implants: A systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(17), 1–14.
Solà Pérez, A., et al. (2022). Success rates of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla: A systematic review. Dentistry Journal, 10(151), 1–18.
Weber, M. I., & Koschitzki, E. (2024). Ocular complications of zygomatic dental implants: A systematic review. Cureus, 16(8), e67535.
Al-Nawas, B., et al. (2023). Relatório de consenso da ITI sobre implantes zigomáticos: Indicações, avaliação de técnicas cirúrgicas e resultados do tratamento a longo prazo. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9
Brånemark, P.-I., et al. (2004). Zygomatic bone fixture in the treatment of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: Technique and long-term results. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 38(2), 70–85.
Brennand Roper, M., et al. (2023). Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(21).
Kammerer, P. W., et al. (2023). Evaluation of surgical techniques on survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: A systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(11).
Polido, W. D., Machado-Fernandez, A., Lin, W.-S., & Aghaloo, T. (2023). Indicações para implantes zigomáticos: Uma revisão sistemática. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(17). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00480-4
Solà Pérez, A., et al. (2022). Taxas de sucesso de implantes zigomáticos para a reabilitação da maxila severamente atrófica: Uma revisão sistemática. Dental Journal, 10(151). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10080151
Aparício, C. (2017). Zygomatic implants: The ZAGA concept. Barcelona: Quintessence Publishing.
Aparício, C., et al. (2017). The ZAGA concept: Zygoma anatomy-guided approach. In Zygomatic implants: The ZAGA concept (pp. 1–20).
Migliorança, R. M., et al. (2006). Implantes zigomáticos: Uma alternativa para a reabilitação de maxilas atróficas. Revista da EAP/APCD, 60(4), 278–283.
Migliorança, R. M. (2008). Reabilitação de maxilas atróficas com implantes zigomáticos. São Paulo: Santos.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.