THE (IN)VALIDITY OF BINDING PRECEDENT Nº. 4 OF THE STF: ANALYSIS OF THE VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR CANCELLATION

Authors

  • Francisco Demontiê Gonçalves Macedo
  • Vivian de Almeida Gregori Torres

Keywords:

Binding Precedent No. 4, Minimum Wage, Fundamental Principles, Fundamental Social Principles and Rights

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and demonstrate that Binding Precedent No. 4, of the Federal Supreme Court, does not meet the minimum requirements for existence, did not follow all formal procedures for creation and did not observe some of the fundamental principles and rights established in the 1988 Constitution, and should, for these reasons, be canceled from the legal system and replaced by another formally adequate statement. The methodology used will be qualitative, bibliographical and documentary.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2025.036-084

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

Issue

Expanded Science: Innovation and Research - 2° Edição

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Macedo, F. D. G., & Torres, V. de A. G. (2025). THE (IN)VALIDITY OF BINDING PRECEDENT Nº. 4 OF THE STF: ANALYSIS OF THE VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR CANCELLATION. Seven Editora, 1636-1660. https://sevenpubl.com.br/editora/article/view/8659